The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you get asked that but then on the downside which is really important to explore let's say the breaking the hip saying can I decrease the chances that I break my hip yes what are the things that I could do if the answer is no then you can say well are there any hedges available to me can i hedge against this bad luck thing happening to me sometimes the answer to that is also no regardless what you can say is okay I've got my hedges set
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.