The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the survey-based evidence out of china which has been rapidly westernizing is that in 2010 2.9 of men aged 18 to 29 were facing pattern hair loss at a cosmetic level now survey data suggests that 60 of uh chinese or china-based university students notice visible hair loss a massive increase
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now survey data suggests that sixty percent of uh chinese or uh china-based university students notice visible hair loss a massive increase