The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do think that now that we understand what are the molecular and genetic drivers of a disease as devastating as glyopblasto, we will have way more powerful tools that will hopefully make it a chronic condition as opposed to a life, you know, a death sentence in 18 months on average.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
That being said, with surgeries, we can get out to years, many years. But a goal would be to make it chronic, potentially cure um by essentially attacking the mechanisms.