The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Um, and I think that's the discussion we need to start having and that brings me back to something else very briefly on medicine and is the this socio-cultural phenomenon where people think that you know medicine is an exact science that the you know when it's not it's not an exact science at all it's an applied science it's a science of human beings it's a social science it's evolving
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.