Paul Saladino· MD
this is so important that we're not always inhibiting mTOR we want to kind of cycle on cycle off cycle on
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
this is so important that we're not always inhibiting mTOR we want to kind of cycle on cycle off cycle on
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think this is so important that we're not always inhibiting mtor we want to kind of cycle on cycle off like a lawn cycle off
i guess it just reinforces this idea of intermittent dosing not just intermittent within the week which i think was clearly established by the phase 2a study but even applying a secondary cycle over the course of a year for example i mean you know that doing a six plus two once a year is probably not adequate so there's some frequency upon which you want to metacycle that