The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
If I'm driving in my car or I'm on my bike and I'm like, is there a position here where I could take a bigger breath? Well, suddenly we might not say that that's a good position or bad position. and we're just like, hey, that position doesn't give me access to as much physiology, as much power, as much volume, as much rotation, as much range of motion.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.