Peter Attia· MD
when you're delving in the area of aesthetic enhancement, you have to understand that there's an overlay where the person that you're seeking out advice from has a substantial financial incentive to treat you.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you're delving in the area of aesthetic enhancement, you have to understand that there's an overlay where the person that you're seeking out advice from has a substantial financial incentive to treat you.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would say the vast majority of physicians are ethical. Um, I do think there are some out there though where it is something that's monetized.