Peter Attia· MD
You're not selecting for fewest--that might mean they don't do hard enough cases--but rather someone who appreciates the risk and can speak to it.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You're not selecting for fewest--that might mean they don't do hard enough cases--but rather someone who appreciates the risk and can speak to it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Ask them to give you their specific complication rate in detail, not just generic complications.
you know we've always been taught you know keep your patients close and your complications closer and and and I try and do that
I think another thing that you mentioned earlier is a qu maybe asking them how often they are receiving complications and managing them. that's probably a sign of skill and seniority in the field if you're kind of the person who's and again it's not about calling out who those complications belong to but it's hey you know uh I'm so okay so last we we've we've talked for a lot longer than I thought we we uh we would but I I'm sorry if we can get you to hold on for a minute longer we can't get out