The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
until today most of the reconstruction of the human diet during the pleistocene and the plasticine and the paleolithic era is more or less the same it's it's about 2.60 or 2.8 i don't remember to about 11 000 years ago it took 2.8 million years to about 11 000 years ago so pleistocene paleolithic era is the same and the reason is that most of the reconstruction of the diet until today was the based almost exclusively on the what i call 20th century hunter gathering
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.