The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the work that was done by Shane Crotty and others in La Jolla looking at people who are naturally infected and then you know if we're exposed to a virus again we're protected they did find that and while antibody responses fade over time and can fade over five six seven months later that memory B cells are still there and and memory T helper cells or memory cytotoxic T cells are there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.