The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a really good amount of evidence to suggest that this is certainly due to plant agriculture and the the actual decline in the quality of the human diet and the reason we can say this is because there's no industrialization you know twelve thousand years ago
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and secondarily i talk about the fact that when we began agriculture our health went south very quickly and there's very good evidence that this is the really the massive change in the nutritional density of our foods that accompanied that as we were hunting less