The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now we have kids that have to have teeth extracted or we have to have pallet expanders now because we realize when we extracted teeth before we made the faces more narrow. And so now the thinking is let's preserve the teeth, expand the pallet when the child is 10, allow those teeth to come in so there's less grinding uh I'm sorry crowding and then that face will be better and uh stronger jawline.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now we have kids that have to have teeth extracted or we have to have pallet expanders now because we realize when we extracted teeth before we made the faces more narrow. And so now the thinking is let's preserve the teeth, expand the pallet when the child is 10, allow those teeth to come in so there's less grinding uh I'm sorry crowding and then that face will be better and uh stronger jawline.