The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Evolution cared (cares?) about reproduction. Many things we observe today in our physiology seem counterintuitive (the presence of apoB for one) in terms of "longevity," until you remember that evolution didn't care--so long as it didn't impact reproductive fitness.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
It's because you're you're past breeding age. Evolution's done with you. You've you've done what you can do. You've passed on your genetic material. Hopefully, you can stay around a little bit longer to raise the next generation, but you've done your job.