The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the cancer cells are likely to have higher levels of deuterium or to be more susceptible to higher levels of deuterium and they have these epigenetic modifications which result in more open chromatin I'm speaking in broad generalizations here but we have more open chromatin in these cancer cells that's going to make them usually divided faster and be more susceptible to chemotherapy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so what you're saying here just so people understand is that the cancer cells are likely to have higher levels of deuterium and they have these epigenetic modifications which result in more open chromatin I'm speaking in broad generalizations here but we have more open chromatin in these cancer cells that's going to make them usually divided faster and be more susceptible to chemotherapy you can use lower doses of chemotherapy for that is that correct yes