The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so the the higher the quality the higher the challenge because high quality brain hey what the food is scarcer so you need more brain and this is how climate gated by their brain so it just we just went to the highest quality possible which is fact and became specialized in obtaining fat so we have it's like we had actually to to get a higher a larger brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think that you have called humans fat hunters primarily which is quite an interesting thing to think that evolutionarily we were probably hunting fat above everything else