The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so I believe and there's now data to support this that the lower rate of capsular contracture with textured implants is due to the incision being made in a safer place that has less exposure to bacteria and not because of anything inherent about the implant
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so by switching to this incision and putting in all these textured implants through this incision under the fold of the breast the surgeons are bypassing a lot of the normal bacteria that exist within the breast and so they're probably introducing fewer bacteria into the pocket around the implant