The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
before well before I started starting in the 50s and 60s they had developed microvascular techniques and that's really the that was the Holy Grail of so much in the hand you could have a a laceration or a war injury or something and there really wasn't much to do for many of those injuries especially nerve and blood vessel related so you would do a lot of amputations you do it just were not reconstructable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because before well before I started starting in the 50s and 60s they had developed microvascular techniques and that's really the that was the Holy Grail of so much in the hand you could have a a laceration or a war injury or something and there really wasn't much to do for many of those injuries especially nerve and blood vessel related so you would do a lot of amputations you do it just were not reconstructable