The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in 10 years we replicated the data in three other population in Amish French centenarians in the CHS here in the United States and in all studies that people that lived the longest had much more of those homozygosity Xin the growth hormone receptor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in all studies that people that lived the longest had much more of those homozygosity Xin the growth hormone receptor so that was a great validation