The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
mouse sex chromosomes are quite a bit different than human sex chromosomes just to give you an example of some genes on the x chromosome do not get inactivated on the inactive x about 15 percent you know you get expression in both sexes in mice that's about three to four percent of the genes on the x chromosome getting activated there are also genes on the y chromosome in humans that are not on the y chromosome in mice and vice versa
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but the other thing is that mouse sex chromosomes are quite a bit different than human sex chromosomes
my house sex chromosomes are quite a bit different than human sex chromosomes um just to give you an example of some genes on the X chromosome do not get inactivated on the inactive X about 15% you know you get expression in both sexes in mice that's about 3 to 4% of the genes on the ex chromosome getting activated there are also genes on the Y chromosome in humans that are not on the Y chromosome in mice and vice versa