The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what we're talking about here if I understand it correctly is a is a hydrogen that has an extra molecule in the nucleus and that's a neutron and the difference between protons and neutrons is that protons have a positive charge and neutrons are neutral and there are also these electrons which are negative and those kind of circulate around so it's kind of like it's like a you know a molecule in the middle and then a bee buzzing around the outside
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so it's kind of like it's like a you know a molecule in the middle and then a bee buzzing around the outside and people may remember from chemistry this may be traumatic for people that this is how atoms in our bodies work at some conceptualization there are nuclei and the nuclei have various amounts of electrons circulating around them and so as you move up the periodic table you gain more things in the nucleus and you gain more electrons and the different orbitals and so a big atom has bigger nucleus and more electrons but we're just talking about the simplest one here and so if I understand it correctly deuterium ISM is an atom of water excuse me of hydrogen that has a proton and a neutron and one electrons so it's doubly heavy because that Neutron has weight