The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There's a great website um called Spurious Correlations. I I've been playing with this website for a long time and went back to it recently that shares examples of how easy it is to find significant correlations, even very strong correlations, between variables that clearly have nothing to do with each other, provided you're willing to look at enough different combinations of variables.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.