The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the goal of the itp when we've tried our best to meet this goal is to develop a fundamentally sound way of testing one question does this drug extend mouse lifespan and we do our best by designing the program in ways so that our answers will be reliable and to the best we can reproducible and believable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the ITP has enough money to just measure lifespan and we're hoping that everybody else is now going to look at the brain and the lungs and the infection and the the sensory systems that really ought to be done and it's not being done because of a lack of money