The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now for the CT scan we almost consider that negligible in our area cuz again I'm dealing with mega voltage highdosese cancer killing radiation and so when they get a CT scan which is going to be just a few millisecevers or milligra um that's almost considered rounding error versus what they're getting to the uh to the tumor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so when they get a CT scan which is going to be just a few milliseceverts or milligra um that's almost considered rounding error versus what they're getting to the uh to the tumor