Rhonda Patrick· PhD
so do you see as epigenetic clocks are not simply markers of cellular senescence they really pick up a different aspect of biology the the radiation and dna damage is kind of surprising
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so do you see as epigenetic clocks are not simply markers of cellular senescence they really pick up a different aspect of biology the the radiation and dna damage is kind of surprising
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.