The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and a resurfacing leaves the femoral head intact and only addresses the acetabulum no it's the opposite yes yes the and I don't do this so I can't really I don't I'm not going to speak to the different intricacies of that um but it's there are there are ways to preserve the amount of bone that you're taking if the per individual is Young I think that's done less now actually lately of late
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.