We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
again I think it's a it's a it's a it's a remarkably poultry sum that is spent on this when you consider the utility that can come of this especially with some of the other um I don't want to use the word ancillary because that's almost disparaging in the sense but these other sort of ACC creative tools that are being bundled onto it such as the neurocognitive assessment uh and the and the Aging biomarkers
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.