The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I remember one of the discussions we had in sort of first year medical school you know this is coming up on 30 years ago um was the the study of Japanese women who moved to the United States and within uh a generation went from very very low rates of breast cancer to assuming the same rate the same high rate of breast cancer as American women
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.