The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we can't put oregon systems into boxes in the human body there's no such thing as a siloed way of medicine we can't say this guy's an immunologist and this guy's an infectious disease specialist because what coronavirus is showing us very clearly is that guess what an infectious disease specialist also has to be an endocrinologist also has to be a cardiologist also has to be a Rheumatologist and also has to be and somebody that understands diet and inflammation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
an infectious disease specialist also has to be an endocrinologist also has to be a cardiologist also has to be a Rheumatologist and also has to be and somebody that understands diet and inflammation