The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the ones that had uh dishes with either red meat or chicken or some kind of poultry like turkey uh in the night they had less frequent uh erections and less hard erections um than the people that had a dish without any uh meat or plant-based dish
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this was an Interventional study yeah this was an Interventional study and was just in that that that documentary game changers yeah yeah how big was that how big was that study how many people were in it there was like 6 15 I don't know something like that like wasn't a very big population so do any crossovers or anything like that to control for different types of interventions