The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and and we eat a pound a ton of this I call genetic information food a year um and it's just we've been gaslighted again through kind of this top down information control to think it's almost like Fringe to talk about this one ton of food we put in our mouth the year that's literally full of hormone disrupting chemicals and neurotoxins and other issues that impact all all over our body
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.