The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you were asking how do you do an assessment so when it is a um more significant case um with significant impairments we frequently can make the diagnosis I'll just be honest you can make it pretty quickly um you you should take a good history you should definitely meet with the child work with the child in the clinic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
depends on the level of severity uh in the child
when it is a um more significant case um with significant impairments we frequently can make the diagnosis I'll just be honest you can make it pretty quickly um you should take a good history you should definitely meet with the child work with the child in the clinic but there are many children where a trained clinician can do that diagnosis pretty quickly in a child with very significant autism it'd be obvious to you if you