The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is a step more in terms of intensity and what you feel those individuals go home with the caths lots of Edema and lots of swelling when you do that procedure so they require catheter for several days to a week right because that steam creates inflammation even though it's cauterizing and if you don't leave that catheter in they're going to get urinary obstruction they not going to be exact
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.