The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The alternative hypothesis would be its dropping off because of social distancing and I don't think that's the case because as we see in many of the countries that are reopening and as I believe we will see when we reopen the United States we we should not see or I do not believe we will see in a reappearance of new infections suggesting that it probably wasn't the social distancing that caused the infections to level off
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.