Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So, my argument is, well, don't try to reinvent the wheel, you know. Use the cells to let them make what they are told by other cells to make, and let's use it right?
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, my argument is, well, don't try to reinvent the wheel, you know. Use the cells to let them make what they are told by other cells to make, and let's use it right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Because, I mean, if you look at the soup, let's call it a soup that they make, there are hundreds or thousands of factors in there, right? ... But ultimately, the complete recipe that the cells make as the result of a screaming kind of, "Hey, we need something," right, that is what is needed. It's very difficult for us to really make that.