The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
slow aging mice 10 now um also have elevated gld1 production in the liver and amount of it in the plasma of the mice we can't prove that that's why bdnf goes up in the brain double Corton goes up in the brain some of these mice are known to have great cognition we can't prove that it's due to gld1 but obviously we we are hoping uh that that is the case
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you exercise gpld1 goes up it's true for mice it's true for people and and more exciting even than that if you have gpld1 go up cognition goes up
all nine kinds of slow aging mice 10 now also have elevated gld1 production in the liver and amount of it in the plasma of the mice we can't prove that that's why bdnf goes up in the brain double Corton goes up in the brain