The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when Jina Lee brought me her irisin data I said oh okay I sort of believe it but you know ir and antibodies have a terrible reputation let's look at the precursor protein FN dc5 in the muscle and uh we decided not to publish it until we had both the irin in plasma and the fndc5 by Western blot in muscle and they were they were paralleling one another so very well that I believed that I believed both of them now
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.