The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the mice are mostly dying of cancer both the males and females about 80 percent of the deaths are due to some form of cancer a wide range of different kinds of cancers but cancer in these mice and most mice is the predominant cause of death
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
then in the females the next leading cause is mammary cancer and the third leading cause is either liver cancer or a fibrosarcoma in the males the second is lung cancer and then liver cancer or fibrosarcoma
how much is hematopoietic in each about 30 of the deaths okay
the other area where we do need to be a little bit circumspect with the use of mice is that 80 of them die of cancers a third of which are hematologic whereas when you look at us all humans die with atherosclerosis about a third die from it