The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the audubon society which has had a pretty long standing contentious relationship or attitude towards animal husbandry has wholesale adopted regenerative agriculture because i don't know what the backstory is and diana this would be an interesting thing for us to explore but i suspect that somebody somewhere got invited to go out to a ranch and this ranch had been using regenerative agriculture and lo and behold the bird species there had exploded
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's fascinating the Audubon Society which has had a pretty long-standing contentious relationship or attitude towards animal husbandry has wholesale adopted regenerative agriculture
if they can do things that enhance the bird species then they're doing things that enhance both the grass the cattle it's beneficial for everything and now the Audubon Society has really changed its position and it is very favorable to the notion of regenerative agriculture outfits like the savory Institute and whatnot