The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a virus is like about a hundred nanometers wide do you know what a nanometer is something there is not yeah it's like a billionth of a meter so if we were to cut one of your hairs and you can barely see the end of your hair when it's cut right how many coronaviruses do you think you could line up across the tip of your hair if it were cut probably hundreds yeah about a thousand actually thousand so think about how small that is that's very small so we can't see these things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.