The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
regardless of what it is our whole if it's under the pec then of course it's really a little farther away not a huge issue but we still the radiation will still affect that area but typically these these implants are pretty pretty tolerant of that the only issue down the road is they may have a capsular contraure or something from fibrosis
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the photons the x-rays we use they they are not at all affected by that it's essentially tissue equivalent
the photons the x-rays we use they they are not at all affected by that it's essentially tissue equivalent
typically these these implants are pretty pretty tolerant of that the only issue down the road is they may have a capsular contraure or something from fibrosis