Peter Attia· MD
in a good year 20 or 25 applications for eight or 10 of them there's a good plausible case to be made that this drug deserves testing and and most of those good plausible cases yield negative results and that's expected
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in a good year 20 or 25 applications for eight or 10 of them there's a good plausible case to be made that this drug deserves testing and and most of those good plausible cases yield negative results and that's expected
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.