The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and there are numerous examples where we've identified whether it's Wilson's disease whether it's severe combined immuno deficiency whether it's a condra plasia but other conditions that are treatable that we just needed to identify those babies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so there are numerous examples where we've identified whether it's Wilson's disease whether it's severe combined immunodeficiency whether it's achondroplasia but other conditions that are treatable that we just needed to identify those babies