The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you find a stress fracture a first visit of somebody on a tibia they've had it for a very long time um so we always get x-rays cuz sometimes there other things in the bone that we need to make sure you know not a tumor or infection or something that we're not expecting but it's rarely rarely positive on the X-ray for the first for the first presentation um it's also you have to get it you know for most insurance companies you need to get an x-ray in order to order an MRI
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
where stress fractures are pretty and MRIs will miss a lot of stress fractures or they always catch them they catch them okay it's the X-ray where you miss it typically