Peter Attia· MD
what was actually new and to me far more intriguing but got much less attention was that the nader was moving over time that was we talked about earlier that in 1990 it wasn't the same as 1970.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what was actually new and to me far more intriguing but got much less attention was that the nader was moving over time that was we talked about earlier that in 1990 it wasn't the same as 1970.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.