The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in general it just tends to be a signal to noise enhancer and so for the non-engineering types out there no problem signal to noise just imagine I'm talking right now and there's a lot of static in the background there are two ways for you to be able to hear me more clearly we can reduce the static or I can increase the Fidelity the the volume and the clarity of what I'm saying okay um for instance and that's really what acetylcholine does
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.