The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
before the human genome was sequenced which I think was around 2000 the first announcement yes yeah there was an expectation that humans would have how many genes based on the understanding of how many genes these far far simpler organisms had so there were estimates for some people as many as a 100,000 genes by comparison I think current estimates are about 20,000 genes
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.