The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so um uh the assessment could be multiple things um there's no uh there's no gold standard like the assessment has to include um certain components but again like as I mentioned it's important that the clinician get to know the child
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the assessment could be multiple things um there's no uh there's no gold standard like the assessment has to include um certain components but again like as I mentioned it's important that the clinician get to know the child