Peter Attia· MD
I imagine that they could they could make it a a prerequisite that your your trial must be pre-registered in order to be published in our journal
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I imagine that they could they could make it a a prerequisite that your your trial must be pre-registered in order to be published in our journal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's also requirements of funding entities which say you're you can't we won't fund you unless the study is pre-registered
and I think and I don't know if there are particular journals to participate in this but I I imagine that they could they could make it a a prerequisite that your trial must be pre-registered in order to be published in our journal
and there's also requirements of funding entities which say you're you can't we won't fund you unless the study is pre-registered