The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's lots of populations not just the Paleolithic people not just the hunter-gatherers but actual essentially modern people living in in Italy Japan in America that we can look to who are living lifestyles and diets that are closer to the land in the sense of you know they're not coming out of grocery stores and in fact in a lot of these places it's hard to even find a grocery store
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.