The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
again generally regarded is safe if you ingest it not if you heat it up to a vapor or steam and so does the FDA not require a reanalysis if the FDA says substance a has a grass designation and substance a has historically been consumed at room temperature and subject to a first pass effect in the liver can anybody come along and say I'm going to burn said substance and it still maintains its grass designation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.